JUDGMENT
Plaintiff was by letter dated 24th August, 2006 employed in the Customs, Excise and Preventive Service now a division of Defendant. It is Plaintiff’s claim that, following an incident involving the interception of a truck in Techiman, he was queried which he replied. Plaintiff averred that, by letter dated 19th May, 2009, he was interdicted alongside four other persons and subsequently appeared before a committee of enquiry. It is Plaintiff’s case that, although Defendant in a correspondence dated 10th April, 2013 informed his Counsel that Plaintiff had been dismissed on 15th January, 2013, Defendant never communicated same to him and has since 19th May, 2009 been on interdiction. Plaintiff averred that, out of the five persons interdicted, three have been recalled. Wherefore, Plaintiff’s claim in the instant suit is for the following reliefs:
a. A declaration of the court that the Plaintiff’s continued interdiction is unlawful.
b. An order for reinstatement of the…