Subject Matter Index

Browse cases by legal subject matter and principles

Attitude of a second appellate court to interference with findings of fact by the trial court and concurred in by the appellate court

Attitude of appellate court to concurrent findings of two lower courts

Attitude of the Supreme Court to interference with concurrent findings of fact

Burden on an appellant seeking an interference with the concurrent findings of fact of two lower courts

Burden placed on an applicant seeking the Supreme Court to interfere with concurrent findings of facts made by lower courts

Circumstances in which an appellate court will interfere with concurrent findings of fact

Circumstances where a second appellate court can interfere with concurrent findings of fact

Circumstances where the Supreme Court will interfere with concurrent findings of facts of Lower Courts

Duty of the second appellate court where there is an appeal against concurrent findings of facts

Instances where the Supreme Court will interfere with concurrent findings of facts made by Lower Courts

Instances where the Supreme Court will not interfere with concurrent findings of facts made by Lower Courts

Presumption of correctness of concurrent findings of facts

The unwillingness of the Supreme Court to set aside concurrent findings of fact

What an appellate court will seek to know when considering a complaint against the lower court's concurrent findings/non-findings of facts

When the Supreme Court will decline to interfere with concurrent findings of fact

When the Supreme Court will interfere with concurrent findings of facts

Whether a court will disturb the concurrent findings of facts because there is a substantial error on the record of the proceedings

Whether an appellate court will interfere with the concurrent findings of facts of lower courts

Whether leave of an appellate court is required before an appeal against concurrent findings of lower courts can be maintained

Whether the principle on concurrent findings of fact applied to the wrongful admission of inadmissible evidence

Whether the rule as to concurrent findings applies to interpretation of statutory provisions

Whether the second appellate court has a duty to satisfy itself that the first appellate court’s judgment is, like the trial court’s, also justified by the evidence on record

Whether the Supreme Court will embark upon an examination of the evidence for the purpose of determining that which is preferable where the facts have been affirmed by the Court of Appeal

Whether the Supreme Court will interfere with concurrent findings of facts made by lower courts

Whether the Supreme Court will set aside the concurrent findings of facts of lower courts

Access More on judy.legal

Get related cases, follow principles for updates, and access AI-powered research.

Explore judy.legal