Subject Matter Index
Browse cases by legal subject matter and principles
ALL
GHANA
NIGERIA
UNITED KINGDOM
WEST AFRICA
Attitude of appellate court to interference with evaluation of evidence by trial court
Attitude of appellate court to interference with the inference drawn by a trial court from facts and evidence before it
Burden placed on a party alleging improper evaluation of evidence
Factors to be considered by an appellate court in determining whether to interfere with a trial Court's evaluation of evidence
On what the appellate court will seek where a judgment of a trial court is attacked on the ground of finding or non-finding of evidence or evaluation of evidence
Power of the appellate court where there is an error in the evaluation of the evidence of witnesses
Principles governing interference with evaluation of the evidence of witnesses
Principles governing the interference with evaluation of evidence
The rule that where there has been improper evaluation of evidence by the trial court, the appeal court can intervene and re-evaluate the evidence
When an appellate court will interfere with a trial court's evaluation of evidence
When an appellate court will interfere with the evaluation of evidence by the trial court
When an appellate court will not interfere with the evaluation of evidence of a trial court
Whether an appellate court can interfere with the evaluation of a document that was not transmitted with the record of appeal
Whether an appellate court can interfere with the evaluation of evidence where the trial Judge properly evaluated the evidence before him
Whether an appellate court can re-evaluate the evidence before the trial Court or substitute its views with that of the lower Courts
Whether an appellate court can reverse the judgment of a lower court without first evaluating evidence not considered by the lower court
Whether an appellate court can substitute its own assessment of the evidence for the trial court's
Whether an appellate court will interfere with the admissibility of inadmissible evidence
Whether an appellate court will interfere with the evaluation of evidence by the trial court
Whether it is the business of an appellate Court to embark on a fresh appraisal of the evidence where the trial Court has unquestionably evaluated and appraised it
Whether the appellate court has the power to re-evaluate evidence
Whether the appellate court in deciding whether to interfere with the evaluation of evidence is concerned with the method or approach employed by the trial court
Access More on judy.legal
Get related cases, follow principles for updates, and access AI-powered research.
Explore judy.legal