Subject Matter Index

Browse cases by legal subject matter and principles

Attitude of appellate court to findings of facts of a trial court

Attitude of appellate court to interference with findings of fact of the lower court

Attitude of appellate courts to finding of facts by the trial court and when such finding may be interfered with

Attitude of the appellate court to the findings and conclusions of a trial court

Attitude of the Supreme Court to findings of fact by a Court of appeal

Burden placed on an appellant challenging the findings of fact of a lower court

Circumstance where an appellate court would interfere with the findings of fact of a trial court

Circumstances under which an appellate court will interfere with finding of fact of a lower court

Circumstances when the Supreme Court will interfere with the findings of fact of lower courts

Distinction between the finding of fact based on the credibility of a witness and a finding which is an inference drawn from facts with respect to the power of an appellate court to interfere

Duty of an appellant who seeks an interference with the findings of fact made by the trial judge

Duty of an appellate court when considering the finding of facts made by a trial courts

Effect of an appellant's failure to satisfy the appellate court that the lower court was wrong in its application of the facts to the applicable law

Effect of failure of an appellant to displace the findings of fact against him

Facts sought by an appellate court where the judgment of the trial court is attacked on the ground of finding or non-finding of facts

General principles guiding the interference with the findings of fact of a trial court

Grounds on which an appellate court will reject or accept the findings of the trial court

Principles for appellate Courts to ascertain whether or not findings of facts of trial Court are perverse

Principles governing the appellate court's interference with findings of fact

The principles upon which an appellate court will set aside findings of fact by a trial court

The rule that where an appellant desires an appellate Court to set aside a specific finding of fact made by a trial Court, he must attack that specific finding

When a finding of fact will be set aside

When an appellate court will interfere with findings of fact

When an appellate court will not interfere with the findings of fact made by the trial judge

When an appellate court will reverse a finding of fact

When the Supreme Court will interfere with a finding on primary fact made by the trial court

Whether a trial court's finding can be interfered with where the trial court properly evaluated the evidence by which the finding was reached

Whether an appellate court can depart from the findings of facts made by the trial court

Whether an appellate court can interfere with findings of a trial court where reasons were assigned for the findings

Whether an appellate court can interfere with findings of fact made by a trial court where there is evidence upon which the findings of facts are hinged

Whether an appellate court can interfere with findings of fact of a lower court

Whether an appellate court can interfere with the findings where the trial jury properly directed the jury

Whether an appellate court can reach a different conclusion on the facts different from that of the trial judge

Whether an appellate court can set aside findings of fact based on the demeanour of witnesses

Whether an appellate court can upset findings of fact made on the evidence of a witness who ought not to have been believed

Whether an appellate court has the same right to come to decisions on issues of fact as well as law as the trial court

Whether an appellate court is entitle to reverse a trial court's findings of fact

Whether an appellate court who interfered with findings of a trial court must give reasons for doing so

Whether an appellate court will disturb a finding because it would have arrived at a different finding on the facts

Whether an appellate court will interfere with the findings of fact of a lower court

Whether an appellate court will interfere with the findings of fact of a trial court

Whether an appellate court will re-evaluate or interfere with the findings of fact of a trial court

Whether an appellate court would disturb a finding of visual and positive identification of the accused person

Whether findings of fact of a lower court bind the appellate court

Whether findings of fact of a trial court in a case of oath against oath can be overturned

Whether or not a second appellate court can interfere with the concurrent findings of the trial and first appellate court

Whether or not an appellate court may set aside a finding of fact made by a trial court and substitute its own findings

Whether the fact that the Court of Appeal substituted its own findings with the trial Court on the basis that the Plaintiff failed to discharge the burden of proof means the judgment was based on a ground of an error of law

Whether the appellate court can substitute its own finding for that of the trial court which had the opportunity of seeing and hearing the witnesses

Whether the Court of Appeal can make findings where the trial court failed to make correct findings

Whether the fact that an appellate court may reach a different conclusion on the evidence is a ground for reversing the trial judge's findings of fact

Whether the fact that an appellate court would prefer to give greater weight to other evidence on record entitle the court to reverse the trial judge’s primary finding of fact which is supportable on the evidence

Whether the findings of a trial court are sacrosanct before an appellate court

Whether the Supreme Court as the second appellate court can substitute its own findings for that of the trial court

Whether the Supreme Court will interfere with the findings of fact of a trial court

Access More on judy.legal

Get related cases, follow principles for updates, and access AI-powered research.

Explore judy.legal