Customer Support

Subject Matter Index

Browse cases by legal subject matter and principles

Cardinal consideration in the admissibility of documents

Circumstances where a document will be rendered inadmissible

Conditions for the admissibility of a document

Criteria for the admissibility of documents in civil and criminal cases

Criteria governing the admissibility of documents

Effect of a document admitted for identification purpose

Effect of failure to raise an objection where a document is tendered in evidence

Effect of failure to raise objection to the admissibility of a document tendered during trial

Exceptions to the rule that a statement made by a person not called to testify is a hearsay and inadmissible in evidence

Exception to the rule that a document must be tendered by its maker

Options open to the appellate court where the trial court fails to rule on the admissibility of a document

Position of the law on the admissibility and weight to be attached to a document where the maker is not called as a witness

Position of the law on the admissibility of a document earlier tendered and and admitted for identification purposes

Precondition for the admissibility of documents

Procedure for receiving contentious documents where the defendant denies having received it

Proper time to raise objection to the admissibility of a document

Status of a document declared inadmissible by a trial court

The admissibility of a document made in the discharge and performance of official duty

The principle that relevance is the hallmark of admissibility of documents

The principle that the law governing the admissibility of documentary evidence is subject to the purpose and purport for which the document is tendered

The procedure for admitting documents in evidence

The proper person to tender a document

The rule excluding the admissibility of documents made when proceedings are pending or anticipated

The rule that a document inadmissible per se cannot be admitted in evidence for any purpose

The rule that the contents of documents may be proved either by primary or secondary evidence

The underlying principle in the requirements of the law on the admissibility of a document

When a document is admissible/inadmissible

When documentary evidence will be admissible

Whether a document not in the language of the court is admissible in the absence of its maker

Whether a document tendered but not admitted as exhibit is evidence upon which the court can rely on in its judgment

Whether a document tendered by a person not sworn and cross-examined as a witness is admissible

Whether a document that is legally inadmissible can be admitted where the other party fails to object

Whether a document that is not legally inadmissible can be admitted where the other party fails to object

Whether a document written in a language other than English language should be translated into English language before it is received as an exhibit

Whether an objection can be raised against the admissiblity of documents in an action commenced by originating summons

Whether an objection to the admissibility of a document can be raised on appeal

Whether an objection to the admissibility of a document must be pleaded

Whether a party can object on appeal to the admissibility of documents admissible in evidence upon the fulfillment of certain conditions or under certain circumstances

Whether a person not shown by credible evidence to be in possession of any documents can be expected to produce them at the trial

Whether a security report marked secret is inadmissible on grounds of state privilege

Whether a statement made by a person not called as a witness can be accorded any probative value

Whether it is open to a party who tenders a document to adopt a portion and ask for a part to be rejected

Whether parties can by sheer collusion and for their mutually anticipated benefit give consent to the admission of a document which the Evidence Act clearly provides is inadmissible

Whether the admissibility of a document attached to an affidavit can be objected to before the hearing of the substantive suit

Whether the admissibility of a document is affected where it was not produced from proper custody

Whether the court can act on any document not tendered and admitted in evidence before the court

Whether the fact that a document has been admitted in evidence means that the document has established or made out the evidence contained therein

Whether the fact that a document is tendered by a member of staff of a company other than the person who made it renders the document inadmissible

Whether the issue of proper custody is relevant to the issue of admissibility of a document

Whether the parties or trial court can, without objection, admit an inadmissible document

Whether the reports of polling agents are admissible through ward supervisors

Whether the secondary evidence of a document is admissible where notice to produce is not given to the other party

Whether the source of a document affects its admissibility

Whether the statement of a person not called as a witness can be tendered in evidence

Access More on judy.legal

Get related cases, follow principles for updates, and access AI-powered research.

Explore judy.legal