Subject Matter Index

Browse cases by legal subject matter and principles

Condition to be satisfied for contradictions to affect a conviction

Considerations for dealing with conflicts that arise from the evidence of prosecution witnesses

Duty of prosecution where there are contradictions in the evidence of prosecution's witnesses

Duty of the court where the evidence of witnesses are contradictory of each other

Duty on a party complaining of contradictions in the evidence of prosecution witnesses

Effect of contradictions in evidence

Effect of contradictions in the evidence of an accused person

Effect of contradictions in the evidence of a prosecution witness

Effect of contradictions in the evidence of the prosecution

Effect of contradictions in the testimonies of witnesses

Effect of contradictory evidence of a party

Effect of material contradictions in a party's case

Effect of material contradictions in the evidence of the prosecution

Effect of material contradictions in the testimony of witnesses

Effect of minor variations in the testimonies of witnesses

Effect of oral evidence of a witness which is inconsistent with his previous statement

How contradictory statements of evidence given by two witnesses/parties are resolved

How to determine whether there are contradictions in the case of a party

Meaning and effect of contradictory evidence

Nature of contradictions in evidence that a party must show to warrant a reversal of judgment

Nature of contradictions in evidence that will affect the case of a party

Nature of contradictions on the evidence of a witness that would be fatal

Nature of contradictions that will result in upturning the decision of a court

Nature of contradictions that would be fatal to the case of the prosecution

Nature of contradictions that would destroy the credibility of a witness

Nature of contradictions that would result in an acquittal

Nature of contradictions that would vitiate a decision

Nature of contradiction that will vitiate a trial

Nature of contradiction that would be sufficient to damnify a witness

Nature of contradiction that would result in the rejection of the evidence of a witness

Position of the law on contradictions in evidence

Position of the law on contradictions in prosecution's evidence

Position of the law where a witness previous statement is inconsistent with his oral testimony in court

Position of the law where the contradictions in the evidence for the prosecution are not material

Position of the law where two witnesses of the same party give contradictory testimony

The correct approach where a witness is shown to have made a previous statement inconsistent with his evidence at the trial

The principle that it is the party who seeks to impeach the credit of a witness that has the burden of satisfying the requirements of law on use of contradictory evidence

The rule that it is impossible for two witnesses to recollect an event the same way

What a material contradiction entails

What an appellant alleging contradictions in evidence of the prosecution witness must show

What constitutes contradictions in evidence

What contradictions in evidence connote

What contradictions in evidence entails

When a piece of evidence will be said to contradict another

When contradictions in the evidence of the defendant will be material

When is a contradiction material?

When the evidence of a party would be said to be contradictory

Whether a court can pick and choose which of the versions of contradictory evidence adduced by a party it would accept

Whether a mere slant in the evidence of witnesses is a contradiction

Whether contradiction in evidence of a witness in a criminal trial is a defence

Whether contradictions in the evidence adduced by prosecution must be resolved in favour of the accused person

Whether contradictions in the evidence of witnesses are always fatal to the case

Whether contradictions must be explained by the prosecution

Whether error as to the part of the head of the deceased that was hit amounts to a material contradiction

Whether every minor conflict or inconsistency in the evidence of a party and a previous statement made by him would qualify to label him as an untruthful witness

Whether evidence on the precise time the incident took place and posture of the deceased at the time he was stabbed are material

Whether it is every contradiction in the evidence of the prosecution that would be fatal to its case

Whether it is every contradiction that can affect a case

Whether it is only contradictions on material issues that can result in disturbing a conviction

Whether the court can pick and choose between the testimonies of the prosecution witnesses which are in conflict

Whether the court can speculate on or proffer the explanation for contradictions in the testimonies of prosecution witnesses

Whether the court should reject a party's case simply because the witnesses contradicted themselves

Whose duty it is to determine whether contradictions in the evidence of a witness will affect affect the quality of the evidence

Access More on judy.legal

Get related cases, follow principles for updates, and access AI-powered research.

Explore judy.legal