Talk to us

Subject Matter Index

Browse cases by legal subject matter and principles

Aim of cross-examination

Duty of a party to use cross-examination to challenge how much of the opponent's testimony he accepts, and how much of it he disputes or rejects

Effect of an evidence that has been thoroughly discredited during cross-examination

Effect of denying a party his right of cross-examination

Effect of evidence elicited during cross-examination

Effect of evidence not contradicted during cross-examination

Effect of evidence not denied during cross-examination

Effect of evidence not subjected to cross-examination

Effect of failure of a witness to show up for cross-examination

Effect of failure of the court to invite a party to cross-examine the witness of the opposing party

Effect of failure to cross-examine a witness

Effect of failure to cross-examine a witness called by the prosecution

Effect of failure to cross-examine a witness on a material fact

Effect of failure to cross-examine a witness on a particular matter

Effect of failure to permit a party to cross-examine a witness

Exception to the rule that a party who fails to challenge the testimony in examination in chief of an adverse party during cross-examination admits that testimony as correct

Function of cross-examination

Importance of cross-examination

Instances where cross-examination will not be held to be an admission

Instances where cross-examination will not be necessary

Position of the law on the evidence elicited by a party from the opponent's witnesses in the course of cross-examination

Position of the law where the evidence of a witness in-chief is subsequently contradicted by him in cross-examination

Proper procedure when confrontation is resorted to in cross-examination

Scope of cross-examination

The exception to the rule that rebutting evidence in cross-examination should be confined to relevant matters

The position of the law where a party gives evidence of a material fact and is not cross-examined on it

The position of the law where the evidence of a witness was not challenged under cross-examination

The propriety of a trial judge taking over cross-examination

Ways of advancing one's case in cross examination

Whether a cross-examiner can ask questions relating to, and extract facts in prove of, the facts he pleaded in the statement of defence

Whether a defence or evidence obtained from a party by his adversary during evidence-in-chief or under cross-examination can be used against that party

Whether all questions in cross-examination must be on direct issues arising out of evidence-in-chief

Whether a mere denial in cross-examination constitutes sufficient proof

Whether an assertion introduced in a case during cross-examination constitutes proof

Whether an unpleaded document is admissible in cross-examination

Whether a party who has not called witnesses of his own can still put forward his case through cross-examination of other witnesses not called by him

Whether a trial judge has the power to cross-examine a witness

Whether a witness who has not been examined in chief can be cross-examined

Whether a witness who testifies in chief can be compelled to appear for cross-examination

Whether cross-examination must be confined to the facts to which the witness testified in his examination-in-chief

Whether cross-examination must be extensive before it can be relevant

Whether evidence not tested by cross-examination is admissible

Whether failure to cross-examine always amounts to acceptance of the witness' testimony

whether failure to cross-examine a party on material issues amounts to complete acceptance of the evidence offered

Whether it is proper not to cross-examine a witness on material issues but simply wait to call rebuttal evidence after the prosecution has closed its case

Whether or not failure to cross-examine always amounts to an admission

Whether "suggesting" or “putting” a fact across to a witness during cross-examination amounts to a sufficient proof of that fact in law

Whether the court can allow a witness who has been cross-examined to be recalled to be cross-examined on facts which were always available but overlooked during the first cross-examination

Whether the court can recall a witness for him to be further cross-examined on a matter that has already been ruled on by the court

Whether the court can wait indefinitely for a witness to surface at any time he pleases to be cross-examined

Whether the defendant's right of cross-examination can be forfeited or waived

Whether the prosecution can rely on evidence, the veracity of which the accused cannot test under cross-examination

Whether the sky is the limit in cross-examination

Whether the testimony of an accused person can be tested by cross-examination

whether weight can be given to evidence not tested by cross-examination

Whether where a witness is cross-examined as to credit and he denies any matter put to him, his answers are conclusive and the cross-examining party is precluded from leading evidence to rebut this denial

Access More on judy.legal

Get related cases, follow principles for updates, and access AI-powered research.

Explore judy.legal