Subject Matter Index

Browse cases by legal subject matter and principles

Condition for recovery of rented premises under section 17(1)(h) of Act 220

Conditions for making an order of recovery of possession and ejectment under section 17(1)(g) of the Rent Act, 1963, Act 220

Conditions for recovery of possession under section 17(1)(i) of the Rent Act, 1963

Considerations for making an order for recovery of possession

Effect of a landlord recovering possession by self-help

Factors to be considered by the court in an order for recovery of possession

Grounds upon which a landlord can recover possession

Need for the claimant to lead evidence in proof of his title over the land in dispute in order to be granted the relief of recovery of possession

Position of the law where the landlord seeks to recover possession for business purposes under section 17(1)(h) of Act 220

Power of landlords of a premises to recover possession of the premises

The law against self-help in recovering possession from a tenant

The principle that the onus of proving “greater hardship” is on the tenants and not on the landlord under section 17 (1) (g) of the Rent Act, 1963 (Act 220)

The true test where the landlord seeks to recover possession for remodelling purposes

Time when the landlord should deliver a declaration where he files an action for recovery of possession

What a landlord seeking order for recovery of possession of premises must do

What a plaintiff must prove in order to succeed in an action for recovery of possession

What constitutes a waiver by a landlord to recover possession of the rented premises

When a court can make an order for recovery of possession

When the court should decline to make an order for possession

Whether a landlord can recover possession of property for the use of his nephew

Whether a landlord is entitled as a trustee to sue in his own name for recovery of possession

Whether a landlord who recovers possession for remodelling purposes must reinstate the defendants on completion of the new scheme

Whether a plaintiff in an action for recovery of possession and ejectment must fit his action into one of the pigeon holes created under section 17 (1) of the Rent Act, 1963 (Act 220) in order to succeed

Whether a plaintiff who claims for recovery of possession and perpetual injunction has put his title in issue

Whether it is necessary for the landlord to plead that he requires his premises for business purposes

Whether or not non-compliance with regulation 18 of the Rent Regulations,1964 (LI 369) will deprive a landlord recovery of possession

Whether other claims can be joined in an action for recovery of possession

Whether recovery of premises by a landlord can be obtained without an order of the court

Whether Regulation 18 of LI 369 must be complied with where the tenant has been guilty of conduct which is a nuisance

Whether the user of land by a lessee must always be taken into consideration when an order is made for recovery of possession at the expiration of the term demised by the lease

Access More on judy.legal

Get related cases, follow principles for updates, and access AI-powered research.

Explore judy.legal