Subject Matter Index
Browse cases by legal subject matter and principles
ALL
GHANA
NIGERIA
UNITED KINGDOM
WEST AFRICA
Advantages of stare decisis
Attitude of the Supreme Court to overruling its decisions
Circumstances in which the Supreme Court may depart from or overrule its previous decisions
Circumstances under which a court can depart from its earlier decision
Circumstances under which a court can overrule its earlier decision
Circumstances under which the Court of Appeal can depart from its previous decision
Circumstances under which the Supreme Court can overrule itself
Circumstances where the Supreme Court may depart from its previous decisions
Condition for the applicability of stare decisis
Conditions to be satisfied for a court to overrule its earlier decision
Distinction between stare decisis and estoppel per rem judicata
Effect of failure of a High Court to follow decisions of the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court
Effect of failure to apply the stare decisis doctrine
Exception to the doctrine of stare decisis
How legal principles in decided authorities should be applied
How the Supreme Court should exercise its power to depart from previous decisions
How the Supreme Court's discretion to depart from its previous decision should be exercised
Meaning and nature of stare decisis
Meaning of stare decisis
Need for precedents to be followed
Position of the law where the court is asked to apply a legislation to ascertained facts
Position of the law where there are inconsistent decisions by the highest court in the land
Position of the law where there are two conflicting decisions of a superior court
Position of the law where there are two conflicting decisions of the Supreme Court
Power of a court to distinguish a decision of a superior court to the case at hand
Principles guiding the Supreme Court and Court of Appeal following their previous decisions under the 1992 Constitution
Principles that the Supreme Court will consider before overruling its previous decisions
Scope of application of the principle of stare decisis
The advantages or import of stare decisis
The authority that will be followed by the court where there is a conflict between statute and a precedent
The benefits of following previous decisions
The binding nature of decisions of the Supreme Court
The mandatoriness of the rule of stare decisis
The paramountcy of decisions of the Supreme Court in relation to courts below
The position of the law on which of two conflicting judgments of the Supreme Court binds the Court of Appeal
The position of the law on which of two conflicting judgments of the Supreme Court should be followed where there is no discernible ratio decidendi
The position of the law where the Supreme Court departs from its earlier decision
The position of the law where there are two inconsistent judgments of a Court with respect to the same case
The power of the Supreme court to overrule its previous decision
The principle that a court is bound by its decision
The principle that cases are judicial authorities only in respect of issues determined
The principle that foreign decisions are merely persuasive authority
The principle that it is the ratio decidendi that binds a subsequent court
The principle that the doctrine of stare decisis applies only in respect of cases with the same facts and/or issues
The principles governing departure of the Supreme Court from its previous decisions
The proper forum for the Supreme Court to depart from its previous decision
The purport of the rule of stare decisis
The rule that a case is only an authority for the facts before it and similar facts arising from subsequent cases as precedent
The rule that a case is only authority for what it decided
The rule that cases are only authorities for what they actually decided in the context of the prevailing facts
The rule that decisions of superior courts are binding on inferior courts
The rule that lower courts should diligently follow the rule of stare decisis
The rule that the Court of Appeal is bound by its previous decisions; exceptions
The underlying consideration for the Supreme Court to overrule its earlier decision
What a party seeking the Supreme Court to overrule its previous decision must establish
What must be satisfied for a review of a decision given on state of facts
What the doctrine of stare decisis postulates
When the doctrine of stare decisis applies
When the doctrine of stare decisis can be applied
Whether a court can give contrary decision to what Supreme Court has decided and pronounced upon
Whether a decision of the Supreme Court can be departed from
Whether a decision of the Supreme Court that has not been overruled must be followed
Whether a High Court can depart from the decision of the Court of Appeal
Whether a lower court can embark on a reinterpretation of a provision already interpreted by the Supreme Court
Whether a lower court can gleefully say that the judgment of a higher court was arrived at per incuriam
Whether a lower court can refuse to follow the decision of a higher court because the lower court thinks that the decision of a higher court is wrong or given per incuriam
Whether a lower court can refuse to follow the decision of a superior court
Whether a lower court is bound to follow the decision of a higher court where he disagrees with it
Whether a Nigerian decision can be overruled by an English authority
Whether a pre-1960 decision of the then Court of Appeal binds any court after the Republican Constitution of 1960
Whether a review application is appropriate for inviting the Supreme Court to depart from its previous decision
Whether a successor court is bound by the decided cases of the court to which it succeeded
Whether all courts lower than the Court of Appeal must follow the decisions of the Court of Appeal
Whether courts below the High Court can ignore the pronouncements of the High Court on a matter before them
Whether courts below the Supreme Court are bound by the decision of the Supreme Court
Whether courts of concurrent jurisdiction are bound to follow the decision of each other
Whether every pronouncement of an appellate or higher court is binding on lower courts
Whether everything said in a decision constitutes binding judicial precedent
Whether it is open to a lower court to disagree with the decision of the higher court on any point
Whether it is proper for a lower court to criticise as wrong a binding authority of a higher court
Whether stare decisis is an absolute bar to reconsideration of a prior decision
Whether the Court of Appeal can depart from its decisions
Whether the Court of Appeal is bound by its previous decisions
Whether the Court of Appeal is bound by its previous decisions
Whether the Court of Appeal is bound by its previous ruling in an interlocutory matter
Whether the Court of Appeal is bound by the pre-1993 cases
Whether the Court of Appeal is bound to follow the decision of the Supreme Court
Whether the current Court of Appeal is bound to follow the previous decisions of Courts of Appeal
Whether the doctrine of stare decisis means that the same conclusion will be reached in each case
Whether the fact that the court casts doubt on existing case law or principle amounts to laying down a new law or principle
Whether the High Court can decline to follow a decision of the Court of Appeal
Whether the High Court is bound to follow the decision of the Court of Appeal reached per incuriam
Whether the High Court or the Supreme Court is bound by the decisions of the West African Court of Appeal
Whether the National House of Chiefs is bound by the decision of the High Court
Whether the rule of stare decisis applies to judgments given per incuriam
Whether the rule of stare decisis extends to errors per incuriam
Whether the Supreme Court can be said to be in error when following its previous and unchallenged decision
Whether the Supreme Court can depart from its earlier decision
Whether the Supreme Court can, sitting as a full court of seven justices, overrule previous decisions
Whether the Supreme Court follows its previous decisions
Whether the Supreme Court has the power to depart from its previous decision on the same constitutional question
Whether the Supreme Court is bound by its previous decisions
Whether the Supreme Court is bound by the decision of the courts established before those under the Fourth Republic
Whether the Supreme Court is bound by the decisions of the West African Court of Appeal
Whether the Supreme Court questions its own decision
Which of two conflicting decisions of the Supreme Court is to be followed
Access More on judy.legal
Get related cases, follow principles for updates, and access AI-powered research.
Explore judy.legal