Subject Matter Index

Browse cases by legal subject matter and principles

Applicability of the Public Officers Protection Act

Circumstances when the issue of malice will arise in connection with Section 2(a) of the Public Officers Protection Act

Conditions for the applicability of Section 2(a) of the Public Officers Protection Act

Duty of a trial court in determining whether the limitation period provided under the Public Officers Protection Act is applicable

Duty of plaintiff to adduce evidence or facts proving that the defendant is not entitled to the protection of the Public Officers Protection Act

Effect of failure to file an action within the period stipulated in the Public Officers Protection Act

Effect of failure to institute an action within the period stated in the Public Officers Protection law

Effect of section 2(a) of the Public Offficers Protection Act

Effect of the Public Officers Protection Act

Exceptions to the applicability of the limitation period provided for under the Public Officers Protection Act

Order to be made where a plea of time bar under the Public Officers (Protection) Act succeeds

Purpose of the Public Officers Protection Act

Scope of the applicability of the Public Officers Protection Act

The import of section 2(a) of the Public Officers Protection Act

The nature of the limitation under the Public Officers Protection Act

The objective of section 2(a) of the Public Officers Protection Law

The position of the law where a non-public officer is sued together with a public officer

The primary objective of the Public Officers Protection Act

The Public Officers Protection Act as a statute of limitation

The rationale for the Public Officers Protection Act

What a party claiming that a public officer entitled to the protection of the Public Officers Protection Act has acted outside the scope of his authority or without legal justification must show

What a party raising limitation of action under the Public Officers Protection Law/Act must show

When a public officer can avail himself of the protection provided for under section 2(a) of the Public Officers Protection Act

When the propriety of the validity/illegality of the act of a public officer can be raised.

When the provision of the Public Officers Protection Act will not avail the defendant

Whether an action brought against the Republic must be instituted within three months

Whether an investigation into the conduct of a public officer can be done where an action was filed outside the limitation period

Whether a person claiming the protection of Section 2(a) of the Law needs to establish a defence of qualified privilege

Whether a public officer can seek the protection of the Public Officers Protection Act in cases of abuse of office

Whether employees of PHCN are public officers entitled to the protection of the Public Officers Protection Act

Whether express malice can permit a plaintiff to institute an action after the limitation period under the Public Officers Protection Act

Whether it requires good faith to avail a defendant the special defence of limitation of action or malice to deprive him of the defence provided under section 2(a) of the Public Officers Protection Act

Whether public officers are immune from suits under the Public Officer Protection Act

Whether the court can pry into the conduct of a public officer entitled to the protection of the Public Officers Protection Act

Whether the defendant relying on the defence of limitation of action portends that his protection under the law is vitiated by malice

Whether the investigation of an act of a public officer is conditional upon the action being initiated within the prescribed period

Whether the provisions of Section 2 of the Public Officers Protection Act will avail a public officer where continuing injury/damage is established

Whether the Public Officer Protection Act applies to statutory bodies

Whether the Public Officers Act applies to a public officer who acts outside the scope of his authority or without a semblance of legal justification

Whether the Public Officers Protection Act applies to actions in contract and tort

Whether the Public Officers Protection Act applies to cases of recovery of land

Whether the Public Officers Protection Act applies to public officers who acted outside the colour of their offices or scope of statutory or constitutional authority/duty

Whether the Public Officers Protection Act applies to the performance or breach of a contract

Whether the Public Officers Protection Act applies where the claim is predicated on breach of contract

Whether the Public Officers Protection Act automatically bars actions against a public officer

Whether the Public Officers Protection Act is applicable to public officers in a state

Whether the Public Officers Protection Act is in contravention of the fair hearing provisions of Section 36 of the 1999 Constitution

Whether the Public Officers Protection Act protects the beneficiaries in respect of contractual or tortious liability arising from the execution of a public duty

Whether the Public Officers Protection Act will cease to apply because a public officer relies on a non-existent law

Whether the Public Officers Protection law applies to criminal prosecution

Whether traditional rulers are public officers entitled to the protection of the Public Officers Protection Act

Access More on judy.legal

Get related cases, follow principles for updates, and access AI-powered research.

Explore judy.legal