Subject Matter Index

Browse cases by legal subject matter and principles

Circumstances where the investigation proceedings of the Commission for Human Rights and Administrative Justice may have to be laid before the Judge

Effect of failure to challenge the decision of the CHRAJ within three months

Functions and powers of the CHRAJ

Functions of the CHRAJ

Grounds upon which the Commission for Human Rights and Administrative Justice may refuse to investigate a complaint

Matters which the Commission for Human Rights and Administrative Justice cannot investigate

Rationale for excluding the functions of the Commission for Human Rights and Administrative Justice from the application of the Limitation Decree

The nature of violations that the Commission for Human Rights and Administrative Justice can investigate

The need for every party appearing before CHRAJ to be given a fair hearing

The status of the CHRAJ

Whether an action by the Commission for Human Rights and Administrative Justice accrues from the date of its decision

Whether an action by the Commission for Human Rights and Administrative Justice would fail whenever it did not make relevant evidence available to the court to "rehear" the matter

Whether complaints of conflict of interest against a public office must be taken before the Commission for Human Rights and Administrative Justice

Whether it is open to the court to call fresh evidence in a matter brought by the CHRAJ for the enforcement of its recommendations

Whether the CHRAJ can commence an action to enforce its recommendation with an originating motion

Whether the CHRAJ can commence an investigation into matters which were concluded before 7 January 1993

Whether the CHRAJ can extend the scope of its investigation to a member of a private sector

Whether the CHRAJ has powers to restore the confiscated properties and assets by virtue of PNDCL 325

Whether the CHRAJ has supervisory jurisdiction over other courts or tribunals

Whether the CHRAJ is precluded from determining a matter regarding the interference of privacy on the ground that it amounts to a tort

Whether the CHRAJ, in the exercise of its investigative functions, is subject to limitation of time

Whether the Commissioner of the CHRAJ has the power to sue a person or authority to enforce compliance with a recommendation or report on any act or omission investigated by him

Whether the functions of the Commission for Human Rights and Administrative Justice are subject to the Limitation Decree, NCRD 54

Whether the operations of the CHRAJ are judicial or quasi-judicial

Whether the recommendations of the Commission for Human Rights and Administrative Justice can be enforced where the matter is statute-barred

Whether the status of the CHRAJ depends entirely on the qualifications, terms and conditions of service of the commissioner or his two deputies or personnel managing or administering the commission

Whether there is a particular method to be adopted where the Commission for Human Rights and Administrative Justice seeks to enforce its recommendations

Access More on judy.legal

Get related cases, follow principles for updates, and access AI-powered research.

Explore judy.legal